Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 1025620160190040447
Korean Journal of Medical Ethics
2016 Volume.19 No. 4 p.447 ~ p.469
A Study on the Justification of Paternalism in Medical Practice
Kim Sang-Deuk

Abstract
This article examines the ethical justification for medical paternalism. After defining paternalism and distinguishing between the weak and the strong versions of that concept, this article considers two com-mon justifications for paternalism: an argument from consent and a consequentialist argument. While weak paternalism is justified significantly by these two arguments, I claim that strong paternalism cannot be justified by the consent argument and also that there are limitations with using the consequentialist argument to justify strong paternalism. I defend a limited concept of paternalism by appealing to the diminished autonomy argument. Since a patient`s autonomy is diminished by illness, physicians have a limited moral obligation to prevent or at least to minimize harm to their patients, as expressed in the Hippocratic Oath.
KEYWORD
paternalism, consent argument, consequentialist argument, prevention of harm argument, argument by diminished autonomy, limited paternalism
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø